Strangers on a Train Essay - 817 Words

Strangers on a Train In Strangers on a Train, Hitchcock uses a unique combination of continuity and narration in order to create a fluid story while also drawing the spectator in with suspenseful situations. The spectator becomes immersed in the story because of how well Hitchcock uses these techniques. The spectator is given all the information throughout the story, which helps Hitchcock create suspense because the spectator worries for the characters because they know the entire situation while the characters are still figuring everything out. With these techniques, Hitchcock tells a unique story while totally engaging the audience in the story. Using the continuity system, Hitchcock uses the shot and reverse shot technique,†¦show more content†¦Also the spectator doesn’t know how Anne will react to this. In the story, Bruno eventually starts to butt into Guy’s life. He starts appearing everywhere watching him and eventually coming up to him and conversing with him as if they ha d never met. Hitchcock reveals to the audience that Anne starts to become suspicious. Anne realizes that something isn’t right when she sees Bruno’s tie clip. Finally, Bruno starts to strangle someone at a party while looking at Anne’s sister. Anne immediately confronts Guy about who Bruno is and Guy tells her everything. By telling select information to Anne, Hitchcock builds the suspense up because the audience doesn’t want Anne to know. One of the best suspense building series of scenes happens when Guy plays his tennis match. While Guy plays his tennis match, many things are happening. Guy must finish his match quickly so he can beat Bruno to the scene of the crime. He also must lose the police that are following his every step. In order to intensify the situation, Hitchcock cuts between the Tennis match and Bruno’s trip to Metcalf. The audience wants Guy to prevent Bruno from planting evidence at the scene of the crime, but at the time it seem s very likely that Bruno will beat him to it. Hitchcock adds even more suspense by making the tennis match last all 5 sets, and at the same time, Bruno drops the lighter down a drain and tries to retrieve it. TheShow MoreRelatedBeing A Stranger On A Train954 Words   |  4 Pagesthe social norms I chose to break was talking to a stranger on a train. I chose this social norm due to its simplicity. As I was on the train, waiting to meet my friend at Times Square, I decided to complete the task. As I boarded the train, I observed the vast amounts of civil inattention being displayed on the train. Many people were on the train were on their cell phones, tablets, books, and newspapers. Considering how I rarely take the train, I decided to use this particular opportunity to breakRead MoreGender Roles In Alfred Hitchcocks Rear Window And Strangers On A Train1232 Words   |  5 Pagesfor quite sometime. Women are often portrayed as sexual objects, or delicate individuals; a body with no b rain or strength. These traits are easily found within many novels and movies- old and new. In Alfred Hitchcock’s films, Rear Window and Strangers on a Train, Hitchcock begins his films representing women with the same characteristics as stated above. They are very stylish, attractive and presented as second-class individuals to males. But after examining these two films, Hitchcock does somethingRead MoreThroughout Alfred Hitchcock’S Filmography, There Are Conspicuous1661 Words   |  7 Pagesfilms. His camera work is what captures the subtle elements, one of the most common implicit tropes are the challenge and switch of the gender norms and sexual ambiguity by the Hitchockian characters and it is not the exception in the film Strangers on a Train (1951). The main characters, Bruno Anthony (Robert Walker) and Guy Haines (Farley Granger), do not ever mention their sexual orientation, but it is implied through the camera that they are homosexuals concealing their ident ities in a criticalRead MoreThe Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time - Original Writing897 Words   |  4 PagesHe discovers the truth about his fathers reckless lies and searches for the answers to the secrets his father has hidden for so long. Screenplay The chapter I have chosen to adapt is when Christopher decides to go to Swindon train station to make a journey to London in search of his mother. As Christopher stands at the bottom of the concrete steps leading to the Stations entrance the audience can see fear in his face. He is wearing a pair of scruffy blue jeansRead MoreTheme and Technique in Films1212 Words   |  5 Pagestechniques depends on the theme of the film and how effective the filmmakers want to communicate their ideas. This essay aims at illuminating theme and technique in films basing its argument on Alfred Hitchcock’s movies; Notorious movie, Rope, and Strangers on the Train. Alfred Hitchcock was a director of movies and his place in the film studies is unrivalled. He is famously known due to his brilliant plots, witty dialogue, and his ability to tell stories visually. This unique ability brought a new revolutionRead MoreAnalysis Of Highsmith Moved Into The Yaddo Artist s Retreat1367 Words   |  6 PagesThis is especially prevalent in regards to her sexuality. Strangers on a Train, Highsmith’s first novel, deals with both psychopathy and homosexuality. The main characters of this novel happen upon one another during a chance encounter on a train. Guy, the protagonist, meets Bruno. Afterward, the two start discussing the problems in their lives, and Guy spills his heart out to Bruno, for â€Å"Bruno was not the ordinary stranger on the train by any means. He was cruel and corrupt enough himself to appreciateRead MoreAn Analysis of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon839 Words   |  4 Pagesdifferent types of autism. Communication, does not like talking to strangers. Behavioural, does not ant normal around other people. Social. Because he does not like things about other people. Christopher Boone has a excellent understanding of his difference from others and displays his three symptoms of autism through his narration. Christopher Boone shows communication problems because, he does not like talking to strangers. Firstly, Christopher gives straight answers to the police officerRead MoreChristopher Boone Conflict1087 Words   |  5 Pagesnovel â€Å"The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time† the readers get a glimpse into the treacherous journey faced by Christopher Boone, and the internal and external conflicts he encounters along the way. Internally he struggles with talking to strangers as he feels he cannot trust them enough when he doesn’t know exactly who they are. He also can be wary of trusting his dad after his father kills the neighbor’s dog and lies to Christopher about his mother’s death. Christopher Boone, a fourteen-year-oldRead MoreLiving with Strangers Analysis1219 Words   |  5 PagesB. Living With Strangers In 2011 8,244,910 people were living in one of the United States’ most famous cities: New York. New York has the highest population density in the United States with over 27000 people per square mile and it is estimated that 200 languages are spoken in the city. In a city with so many people, different cultures, and languages converts may have difficulties with growing accustomed to a city full of strangers. The American novelist and essayist, Siri Hustvedt, debatesRead MoreAnalysis Of Agatha Christie s And Then There Were None 1448 Words   |  6 PagesJournal Number One The book â€Å"And then there were None,† by Agatha Christie, thus far, I feel has an unrealistic plot, but the format and writing style of this story makes it very intriguing to read. I find it odd how ten strangers get a letter from someone they are not too familiar with and regardless of the fact that some of them haven t even meet the host’s, all ten characters decide to accept the invitation to Soldier Island. It seems unrealistic because almost no one would offer you a free vacation

Why Did Stegosaurus Have Plates on Its Back

If it werent for its pointed, symmetrical, vaguely threatening-looking plates, Stegosaurus would be a completely unremarkable dinosaur—a bland, small-brained, second-tier plant eater like Iguanodon. Fortunately for its place in the popular imagination, though, the late Jurassic Stegosaurus possessed one of the most distinctive dos in the animal kingdom, those double rows of tough, bony, roughly triangular plates that lined this dinosaurs back and neck. Plate Hypotheses It has taken a long time, though, for these plates to be assigned their proper position and function—or, at least, to what most modern dinosaur experts today believe to be their proper position and function. In 1877, the famous American paleontologist Othniel C. Marsh coined the name Stegosaurus, Greek for roof lizard, because he believed that this dinosaurs plates lay flat along the top of its torso, much like the armor of a crocodile. (In fact, Marsh was initially under the impression that he was dealing with a giant prehistoric turtle!) A few years after this blunder—upon realizing that Stegosaurus was, in fact, a dinosaur and not a turtle—Marsh speculated that its triangular plates lined up sequentially, one after the other, across its back. It wasnt until the 1960s and 1970s that further fossil evidence was uncovered indicating that the plates of Stegosaurus were actually arranged in two alternating, offset  rows. Today, virtually all modern reconstructions use this arrangement, with some variation in how far the plates are tilted toward one side or another. The Purpose of the Plates Unless further evidence comes to light—and Stegosaurus is already extremely well-represented in the fossil record, so any surprises seem unlikely—paleontologists agree about how Stegosaurus wore its plates. The structure of these plates is also uncontroversial; basically, they were giant-sized versions of the osteoderms (protrusions of bony skin) that are found on modern crocodiles, and may (or may not) have been covered in a layer of sensitive skin. Crucially, the plates of Stegosaurus werent directly attached to this dinosaurs backbone, but rather to its thick epidermis, which afforded them more flexibility and a wider range of motion. So what was the function of Stegosaurus plates? There are a few current theories: The plates were a sexually selected characteristic—that is, males with bigger, pointier plates were more attractive to females during mating season, or vice versa. In other words, the plates of a male Stegosaurus were roughly analogous to the tail of a male peacock! (To date, unfortunately, we have no evidence that the size of Stegosaurus plates varied among individuals or between sexes.)The plates were a temperature-regulation device. If Stegosaurus was, in fact, cold-blooded (as most plant-eating dinosaurs of the Mesozoic Era presumably were), it might have used its plates to soak up light from the sun during the day and dissipate extra body heat at night. A 1986 study concluded that the outer layers of Stegosaurus plates were thickly lined with blood vessels, which helps support this theory.The plates made Stegosaurus appear bigger to (presumably near-sighted) meat-eating dinosaurs like the contemporary Allosaurus. Stegosaurus adults with bigger plates would have been parti cularly unattractive to predators, and thus this trait was passed on to successive generations. This may have been an especially  important consideration for newborns and juveniles, as an adult Stegosaurus would have been quite a mouthful, with or without plates!The plates served an active defensive function, especially  since they were only loosely anchored to this dinosaurs skin. When Stegosaurus listed to one side in response to an attack, the sharp edges of the plates would tilt toward its antagonist, which would presumably look for a more tractable meal elsewhere. Not many scientists subscribe to this theory, which has been advanced by the maverick paleontologist Robert Bakker.The plates were covered with a thin membrane of skin and were capable of changing color (say, to bright pink or red). This Stegosaurus blush might have served a sexual function, or it may have been used to signal other members of the herd about approaching danger or nearby food sources. The plates hig h degree of vascularization, mentioned above in reference to temperature regulation, also supports this theory. The Mystery Persists So what is the most likely answer? The fact is that evolution has a way of adapting specific anatomical features to multiple functions, so it may well be that the plates of Stegosaurus were literally all of the above: a sexually selected characteristic, a means to intimidate or defend against predators, and a temperature-regulation device. On the whole, though, the bulk of the evidence points primarily to a sexual/signaling function, as is the case with many otherwise puzzling dinosaur features, such as the long necks of sauropods, the huge frills of ceratopsians, and the elaborate crests of hadrosaurs.

Achilles and Odyssey Compare and Contrast Essay Free Essays

Larger-Than-Life Heroes: Achilles and Odysseus What are the main characteristics of a larger-than-life epic hero? An epic hero is a brave and powerful warrior who is motivated to fight both internal and external conflicts to achieve glory and ranks above a normal man. In Homer’s epic poems The Iliad and The Odyssey, Achilles and Odysseus are the well-known heroes. Achilles fights Hektor outside the walls of Troy because Hektor killed his best friend, Patroclus. We will write a custom essay sample on Achilles and Odyssey Compare and Contrast Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now After fighting in the Trojan War, Odysseus takes on a journey to return back to Ithaca to see his wife, Penelope, and his son, Telemachus. Through his use of tone, figurative language, mood, and imagery, Homer’s epic poems The Iliad and The Odyssey show how Achilles and Odysseus, despite their struggles with themselves and the world, are true heroes because of their motivation for glory and revenge. Achilles and Odysseus are struggling to be viewed as tenacious warriors because of an empty place in their hearts. For instance, Agamemnon takes Achilles’ prize, Briseis, and exclaims â€Å"See how the lord of the great plains, Agamemnon, humiliated me! He has my prize, by his own whim, for himself† (Iliad. . 168-169). Achilles feels humiliated because Agamemnon took his prize, Briseis, away from him in order to return Chryseis. He still does not want to go to war after Agamemnon returns her. Achilles’ heart is aching and the thought of never seeing his prize again worries him. Homer uses mood to make the reader feel pity for Achilles. Even though Achilles treats Briseis as a prize, it is depressi ng that he does not have her in his arms. Achilles and Briseis fell in love with each other and were separated such as in a more modern movie called The Swan Princess. Homer makes it seem like Agamemnon is the villain while Achilles is the hero. Achilles’ internal conflict shows how he must cope with not having Briseis in his arms because he did not want to fight in the war. Even so, Odysseus longs to return to his homeland, Ithaca, and â€Å"†¦his sweet life [is] flowing away with the tears he wept for his foiled journey home† (Odyssey. 5. 168-169). Odysseus is depressed because he wants to return to his home in Ithaca and see his wife, Penelope, and son, Telemachus, after fighting in the Trojan War. He feels as if his life is transitioning from sweet to bitter. Homer uses imagery to show how Odysseus is crying for his homeland, Ithaca. It creates a depressing mood for the reader because all Odysseus wants is to see his family and return home after a tiresome war, but has failed. The metaphor of Achilles’ sweet life flowing away demonstrates how his lamentations are characterizing him as homesick and how he might not make it through his journey. Achilles struggles with not having a prize while Agamemnon struggles with not sleeping in his own bed for an extensive time. The difference between the internal conflicts is that Achilles cannot fight in war because Briseis is not with him while Odysseus cannot return home and reunite with his family after fighting in the war. Although they both have concerns for their loved ones, Achilles and Odysseus must set them aside and fight their enemies first. Achilles and Odysseus are both epic heroes because they face their external conflicts or struggles with the world and fight as strong warriors. First, Achilles stabbed Hektor in the neck and then â€Å"†¦had in mind for Hektor’s body outrage and shame. Behind both feet he pierced the tendons, heel to ankle. Rawhide cords he drew through both and lashed them to his chariot, letting the man’s head trail† (Iliad. 22. 467-471). Achilles fights and kills Hektor outside the walls of Troy because he killed Achilles’ best friend, Patroclus. After stabbing Hektor in the throat, he ties Hektor’s ankles to his chariot and rides off, dragging him. Hektor uses imagery to show how Achilles ties Hektor to his chariot, and injures him while riding off. Homer also uses tone to explain Achilles’ anger toward Hektor for killing Patroclus. Even so, after slaughtering all of the suitors in his home â€Å"Odysseus scanned his house to see if any man still skulked alive, still hoped to avoid black death† (Odyssey. 22. 406-407). Odysseus finally returns to his home in Ithaca disguised as a beggar by Athena. He is only one out of all the suitors to string Odysseus’ bow, because he is Odysseus and stronger than any man alive. Athena then reveals Odysseus and he and his son, Telemachus, kill all of the suitors in his home. Homer uses imagery to show Odysseus looking around his house to find any more suitors that were still alive. He wanted to no suitor was still alive so he could be in peace with his wife, Penelope. His external conflict is not being able to return home in peace. He must kill all of the suitors, for they wanted to marry Penelope and become King of Ithaca. Odysseus needed to show that he had returned as King of Ithaca and was more powerful than all of the suitors combined. Achilles’ external conflict is fighting Hektor and Odysseus’ external conflict is conquering the suitors. Achilles and Odysseus deal with their external conflicts by conquering their enemies. Achilles and Odysseus are both motivated to face and conquer their struggles with the world for glory and revenge. In fact, Achilles chased Hektor around the walls of Troy three times and â€Å"†¦ ran full speed, and not for bull’s hide or a ritual beast or any prize that men compete for: no but for the life of Hektor, tamer of horses† (Iliad. 22. 189-192). Achilles chases Hektor around the walls of Troy three times because he wants to kill him as a prize. Achilles wants to receive the glory of a stronger warrior and seek revenge on Hektor for killing his best friend, Patroclus. Homer uses imagery to show Achilles’ determination to have Hektor’s dead body for revenge. The reader can picture swift-footed Achilles on the heels of Hektor, tamer of horses. Achilles almost reaches Hektor, while Hektor almost outruns Achilles. In the end, Achilles conquers Hektor and gains glory for being the stronger warrior and proving himself to being larger-than-life. And then, Odysseus is determined to be reunited with his wife, Penelope, and says â€Å"Nevertheless I long-I pine, all my days-to travel home and see the dawn of my return. And if a god wreck me yet again on the wine-dark sea, I can bear that too†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Odyssey. . 241-244). Odysseus does not give up returning to Ithaca because he wants to see his family. He will bear anything that comes along his way to his journey home. Homer uses mood to make the reader feel hope for Odysseus on returning home safely and how he is ready to fight obstacles that the gods put upon him along his journey. He is motivated to return home because he wants to conquer the suitors, which will earn him glory and prove him to be larger-than-life. He also wants to seek revenge on the suitors that have caused Penelope harm while he was away. It proves that Odysseus saved his wife with the help of his son and how he ranks higher than the suitors. Achilles fights Hektor for his body and glory from the Greeks. Odysseus wants to return home so he can be glorified after seeking revenge on the suitors by murdering them. Achilles and Odysseus both seek revenge on their enemies for what they have done to their loved ones. Achilles and Odysseus are well-known heroes in Homer’s epic poems The Iliad and The Odyssey. Through both poems, the heroes experience internal and external conflicts such as battles with other warriors and missing loved nes. Glory plays a huge role in these characters and they want to be well-known for their actions such as how Achilles conquered Hektor or how Odysseus conquered the suitors. Achilles and Odysseus have the main characteristics of an epic hero, but gain them in different ways. In their internal conflicts, Achilles misses Briseis while Odysseus misses his home, Ithaca, as well as his wife Penelope, and son, Telemachus. In The Iliad, Achilles and Briseis are separated from each other just as how Princess Odette and Prince Derek and separated from each other in the 1994 movie, The Swan Princess. The internal conflict of Achilles can be related to movies such as The Swan Princess today. In their external conflicts, Achilles fights Hektor, tamer of horses, while Odysseus fights the commanding suitors in Ithaca. Achilles conquers Hektor for his life and to gain glory by becoming the greater warrior. Odysseus along with his son, Telemachus, conquers the suitors and gain glory. Achilles and Odysseus seek revenge on their enemies. Achilles kills Hektor because he killed his best friend, Patroclus. He lost his best friend forever and needed to get Hektor back by taking his life. Odysseus seeks revenge on the suitors for harming his wife and taking advantage of her hospitality, such as making a mess during feasts. People today also seek revenge on people that have caused them harm. Achilles and Odysseus have shaped what an epic hero is and show that even though they lived two different lives, they both showed the characteristics of an epic hero and how they must be a brave and powerful warrior who is motivated to fight both internal and external conflicts to achieve glory. Overall, although Achilles and Odysseus are two different characters, their similar characteristics define what an epic hero is. How to cite Achilles and Odyssey Compare and Contrast Essay, Essay examples

Discussion About Introduction And Abstract †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discussion About Introduction And Abstract? Answer: Introducation An abstract is an overview of an entire research review or article paper that emphasises on a particular topic. As asserted by Defazio et al., (2012), abstract highlights an existing thought or an idea that lacks concrete or physical evidence. An abstract is used by many researchers in order to provide an idea of the actual purpose of the research paper. This saves times for the readers as reading the abstract judges the suitability of the topic for readers. Therefore, an abstract makes it easier for the researchers to easily communicate the complex topics for the readers. An abstract generally consists of the summarisation of the entire topic including the literature review, methodologies, results and interpretations. Under the copyright law, an abstract is protected making it more secure. In academic writing an introduction plays a significant part as this highlights the topic of the research, essay or assignment. An in-depth knowledge is provided in the introduction about the topic. This introduction discusses the topic and its significance. Generally, an introduction consists of three paragraphs. The first paragraph is written about the study that is been produced in the assignment. The second paragraph consists of the direct information of the assignment. These two paragraphs are most important part of the introduction. However, an introduction also consists of a third paragraph that consists of the entire structure of the assignment. This also describes the scope of the entire assignment or the research paper along with explaining certain features that are essential for the assignment (Bailey, 2014) References Bailey, S. (2014). Academic writing: A handbook for international students. Routledge. Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., Hook, S. A. (2012). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculuma case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47.